The Origin of the Supreme Judicial
Court Law Clerk System
(This article was prepared for the
first meeting of the Law Clerks' Society by Robert Bloom, Deputy
Administrative Assistant to the Supreme Judicial Court Justices)
The Supreme Judicial Courts practice of employing
law clerks can be traced to a justice of that court from the nineteenth
century, Horace Gray.
Gray
was born in 1828 in Boston to a family prominent in shipping and
commerce. He graduated from Harvard College in 1845 and, after traveling
in Europe, returned home to enter Harvard Law School in 1848. Admitted
to the bar in 1851, he established a law practice in Boston. Soon
after beginning his practice, Gray was called to the Supreme Judicial
Court to fill in for the Reporter of Decisions, Luther S. Cushing,
who was ill. Gray accepted the temporary position and completed
the final volume of Cushings Reports. When Cushing
died in 1854, Gray was appointed to succeed him. He would be the
Reporter on sixteen volumes of the Massachusetts Reports.
While he was Reporter, Grays strong anti-slavery views caused
him to join the Free Soil Party and then the newly formed Republican
Party. In 1864, during the Civil War, at the time the Army of the
Potomac was besieging Petersburg, Virginia, and General Sherman
was approaching Atlanta, Governor John A. Andrew appointed Gray
to the Supreme Judicial Court. At age thirty-six, he was the youngest
man ever appointed to the court. In 1873, he was named Chief Justice.
In 1881, Grays
friend, Senator George F. Hoar of Massachusetts, urged President
Garfield to appoint Gray to the United States Supreme Court, but
Garfield was assassinated before he could act on this proposal.
Many thought that Grays chance to join the U.S. Supreme Court
died with President Garfield. But Senator Hoar pressed the new President,
Chester A. Arthur, to appoint Gray. To almost universal surprise,
Arthur nominated Gray who served on that Court for twenty years.
Gray suffered a stroke in 1902 and resigned from the Court. Two
months later he died in Nahant, Massachusetts. His opinions can
be found in forty-three volumes of the Massachusetts Reports
and eighty-one volumes of U.S. Supreme Court cases.
Horace Gray instituted the practice of using law clerks
due to rising appellate caseloads. About the time Gray became an
Associate Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court, appellate courts
in the United States were hit by a tidal wave of cases. Among the
reasons for this phenomenon were the industrial revolution, the
spread of railroads, rapid developments in corporate and tort law,
and population growth. In 1873, partly in response to rising appellate
caseloads, the Legislature increased the number of Supreme Judicial
Court justices to seven and that same year Gray was named Chief
Justice of that court.
Gray assumed a greatly increased workload. Not only was he writing
almost twenty-five percent of the courts opinions, but also
he was presiding over trials (torts, divorce, contract, and capital
crimes) that were still part of the Supreme Judicial Courts
jurisdiction. The new chief justice needed help. In 1875, he turned
to his half brother, John Chipman Gray, a professor at Harvard,
to recommend a recently graduated and highly ranked Harvard Law
School student to fill a new one-year position that Gray called
secretary and we now identify as law clerk.
One of the first of Grays new law clerks was none other than
Louis D. Brandeis. As it appears that the new position was not publicly
funded, it is most likely that Gray paid his law clerks out of his
own pocket.
Gray was the first judge in the United States to use law clerks.
When he joined the United States Supreme Court, in 1882, Justice
Gray continued the practice, which eventually spread to courts throughout
the country.
In 1886, Congress acted upon the recommendation of
the Attorney General and provided for a stenographic clerk
for each justice of the Supreme Court at a salary of $1,600 per
year. Justice Gray did not use his law clerks as mere stenographic
clerks. A description provided by Grays law clerk,
Samuel Williston (remember Williston on Contracts?), indicates that
Gray used his law clerk in the traditional mannerreviewing
newly filed cases, discussing opinions by other justices, engaging
in a vigorous colloquy on opinions, and drafting memoranda.
Shortly after Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., joined the
Supreme Judicial Court in 1882, he wrote in a letter: We are
very hard worked and some of the older judges affirm that no one
can do all the work without breaking down. When he joined
the U.S. Supreme Court, Holmes took up Grays practice of employing
a new honor graduate from Harvard each year. Like Gray, Holmes relied
on recommendations from Professor John Chipman Gray. Later Holmes
relied on the advice of Felix Frankfurter. Around the time of Holmess
retirement from the Supreme Court, in the 1930s, the institution
of law clerks became entrenched in the federal judiciary when it
was introduced to the lower federal courts.
Unfortunately, the available list of law clerks in
the Supreme Judicial Court goes back only to the fall of 1922 and
the law clerks between Grays first clerk in 1875 and 1922
are thus unknown. Fortunately, a great deal is known about Louis
Brandeis.
The law clerk list that is available
is an impressive roster of notable attorneys. In addition to the
U.S. Supreme Court justice already mentioned, included are a Supreme
Judicial Court justice, several chief justices of other Massachusetts
courts, a governor and an attorney general of the Commonwealth,
many judges, state and federal, a reporter of decisions, a law school
dean, numerous law school professors, a frequently-quoted doctor/medical
ethicist, bar association presidents, and several novelists. Womens
names first show up on the list in 1943. World War II, no doubt,
played a role in that. One of those early female clerks, Marilyn
M. Sullivan, became Chief Justice of the Land Courtthe first
female chief justice in Massachusetts history (at the present time,
four of the nine chief justices of the Massachusetts courts are
women).
On June 11, 2002, former Supreme Judicial Court Law Clerks held
their first formal reunion
to renew old friendships and to discuss the establishment of a permanent
organization from whose members new ideas about the historic restoration
program for the John Adams Courthouse and for future programs related
to the Court and its 310-year history might be produced.
|